Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity

Abd Al Karim Jaafar

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity

Abd Al Karim Jaafar

Published in American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics (Volume 7, Issue 4)

Received: 10 October 2020 Accepted: 21 October 2020 Published: 5 November 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at the farm of Abu Jarash in Agricultural College, using different rates of olive solid waste and cow manure, as follows: (control, Mineral fertilizer +NPK, fresh olive solid waste100%, fresh olive solid waste 75%+ cow manure 25%, fresh olive solid waste 50%+ cow manure 50%, fermented olive solid waste 100%, fermented olive solid waste 75%+ cow manure 25%, fermented olive solid waste 50%+ cow manure 50%, cow manure 100%) the Zink ground fertilizers added for all previous treatments, and cultivation of wheat, the forms of zinc were followed by serial extraction and the study led to the following results: the fermented olive solid waste 100% treatment was Superiority in the amount of zinc forms as following: (total, soluble, exchanged, linked with carbonate, linked with organic matter linked with iron and manganese oxides and residual) the amounts of Zinc were (114.14, 0.19048, 1.0710, 6.329, 9.433, 21.04, 76.10) mg/kg in the same previous order. While the zinc values in the control treatment were (62.90, 0.03847, 0.6081, 3.29, 6.083, 15.03, 37.2) mg/kg for the same forms and in the same previous order. The fermented olive solid waste treatment 100% had the highest yield (5.980) ton/h. The control treatment had the lowest value (3.987) ton/h.

Published in	American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics (Volume 7, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12
Page(s)	81-87
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Olive Solid Waste, Cow Manure, Serial Extraction, Zinc, Calcareous Soil

References

[1]	Abd-Elfattah, A. and Wada, K., 1981. Adsorption of lead, copper, zinc, cobalt and cadmium by soils that differ in cation-exchange materials, J. Soil Sci., 32, 271-283.
[2]	Abollino O, Giacomino A, Malandrino M, Mentasti E. Aceto M and Barberis R. 2006. Assessment of metal availability in a contaminated soil by sequential extraction. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution. 137: 315–338. DOI: 10.1007/s11270-005-9006-9 Springer.
[3]	Acunaz C (1987). A study on refinements and utilization of black water from olive press plants of taris olive oil union Turkey. R&D project no: 012: 65-78.
[4]	Alidoust D., Suzuki S., Matsumura S. and Yoshida M. 2012. Chemical speciation of heavy metals in the fractionated rhizosphere soils of sunflower cultivated on a humic Andosol. Common. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 43 (17): 2314-2322.
[5]	Behera KS, Singh D, Dwivedi BS, Singh S, Kumar K, Rana, DS (2008). Distribution of fractions of zinc and their contribution towards availability and plant uptake of zinc under long-term maize and wheat cropping on an inceptisol. Australian Journal of Soil Research, 46: 83-89.
[6]	Carter, R. M. (2002): Organic matter and Aggregation interactions that maintain soil functions. Agronomy Journal. 94: 38-47.
[7]	Doberman A., Fairhurst T. 2000. Rice: Nutrient disorders and nutrient management. Potash and Phosphate Institute of Canada and International Rice Research Institute, Los Baños, Philippines.
[8]	Jackson, M. L. (1973) Soil chemical and analysis prentice Hall of India private limited- New Delhi.
[9]	Kavdır, Y., Killi, D., 2008. nfluence of olive oil solid waste applications on soil pH, electrical conductivity, soil nitrogen transformations, carbon content and aggregate stability. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, Volume 82, Pages 157-165.
[10]	Meers E., Unamuno V. Laing R.,. 2006. Zn in the soil solution of unpolluted and polluted soils as affected by soil characteristics. Geoderma136: 107–119.
[11]	Morabito R. 1995. Extraction techniques in speciation analysis of environmental samples. Fresenius J Anal Chem 351: 378-385.
[12]	Nasra. R, and Sameer shamsham. 2017. The effect of the main properties of soil on forms of some microelements in selected soils of Homs Governorate. phD thesis, Al Baath university.
[13]	Page, A. L., R. H. Miller and D. R. Keeney. (1982). Methods of soil analysis, part (2) 2^nd ed. Agronomy g–Wisconsin, Madison. Amer. Soc. Agron. Inc. Publisher.
[14]	Richards, Ag A, (1954) – Diagnosis and Improvements of saline and alkali soils, VSDA. Agriculture Handbook 60.160p.
[15]	Seferoğlu S, Kılınç I (2002). An investigation on use of olive vegetation water as fertilizer for wheat. 13^th International Scientific Centre of Fertilizers (CIEC) Tokat. Proceedings, pp. 350-359.
[16]	Shober A. L., Stehouwer R. C. and MacNeal K. E. 2007. Chemical fractionation of trace elements in biosolid-amended soils and correlation with trace elements in crop tissue. Commune. Soil Sci. Plant Anal. 38 (7-8): 1029-1046.
[17]	Shuman L. M. 1985. Fractionation method for soil microelements. Soil Sci., 140: 11-22.
[18]	Smolders E., Degryse F. 2006. Fixation of cadmium and zinc in soils: implication for risk assessment. In: Natural Attenuation of Trace Element Availability in Soils, eds. R. Hamon, M. McLaughlin, E. Lombi, 157–171, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL.
[19]	Tessier A., Campbell P. G. C. and Bisson M. 1979. “Sequential Extraction Procedure for the Speciation of Particulate Traces Metal,” Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 51, No. 7, pp. 844-851. doi: 10.1021/ac50043a017.
[20]	Udom B. E., Mbagwu J. S. C., Adesodun J. K., Agbin N. N. 2004. Distribution of Zn, Cd, Cu and Pb in a tropical Ultisol after long term disposal of sewage sludge. Environment. International, 30: 467-470.
[21]	Wong J. W. C., Li K. L., Zhou L. X., Selvam A. 2007. The sorption of Cd and Zn by different soils in the presence of dissolved organic matter from sludge. Geoderma137: 310–317.
[22]	Zyrin N. G. Rerikh, V. I. Tikhomirov, F. A. Moskovskij. 1976. Forms of zinc compounds in soils and its supply to plants. Extent: v. 124-132.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abd Al Karim Jaafar. (2021). Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 7(4), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abd Al Karim Jaafar. Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2021, 7(4), 81-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abd Al Karim Jaafar. Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity. Am J Biol Environ Stat. 2021;7(4):81-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12,
  author = {Abd Al Karim Jaafar},
  title = {Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity},
  journal = {American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics},
  volume = {7},
  number = {4},
  pages = {81-87},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbes.20210704.12},
  abstract = {A field experiment was conducted at the farm of Abu Jarash in Agricultural College, using different rates of olive solid waste and cow manure, as follows: (control, Mineral fertilizer +NPK, fresh olive solid waste100%, fresh olive solid waste 75%+ cow manure 25%, fresh olive solid waste 50%+ cow manure 50%, fermented olive solid waste 100%, fermented olive solid waste 75%+ cow manure 25%, fermented olive solid waste 50%+ cow manure 50%, cow manure 100%) the Zink ground fertilizers added for all previous treatments, and cultivation of wheat, the forms of zinc were followed by serial extraction and the study led to the following results: the fermented olive solid waste 100% treatment was Superiority in the amount of zinc forms as following: (total, soluble, exchanged, linked with carbonate, linked with organic matter linked with iron and manganese oxides and residual) the amounts of Zinc were (114.14, 0.19048, 1.0710, 6.329, 9.433, 21.04, 76.10) mg/kg in the same previous order. While the zinc values in the control treatment were (62.90, 0.03847, 0.6081, 3.29, 6.083, 15.03, 37.2) mg/kg for the same forms and in the same previous order. The fermented olive solid waste treatment 100% had the highest yield (5.980) ton/h. The control treatment had the lowest value (3.987) ton/h.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity
AU  - Abd Al Karim Jaafar
Y1  - 2021/11/05
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12
T2  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
JF  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
JO  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
SP  - 81
EP  - 87
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2471-979X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12
AB  - A field experiment was conducted at the farm of Abu Jarash in Agricultural College, using different rates of olive solid waste and cow manure, as follows: (control, Mineral fertilizer +NPK, fresh olive solid waste100%, fresh olive solid waste 75%+ cow manure 25%, fresh olive solid waste 50%+ cow manure 50%, fermented olive solid waste 100%, fermented olive solid waste 75%+ cow manure 25%, fermented olive solid waste 50%+ cow manure 50%, cow manure 100%) the Zink ground fertilizers added for all previous treatments, and cultivation of wheat, the forms of zinc were followed by serial extraction and the study led to the following results: the fermented olive solid waste 100% treatment was Superiority in the amount of zinc forms as following: (total, soluble, exchanged, linked with carbonate, linked with organic matter linked with iron and manganese oxides and residual) the amounts of Zinc were (114.14, 0.19048, 1.0710, 6.329, 9.433, 21.04, 76.10) mg/kg in the same previous order. While the zinc values in the control treatment were (62.90, 0.03847, 0.6081, 3.29, 6.083, 15.03, 37.2) mg/kg for the same forms and in the same previous order. The fermented olive solid waste treatment 100% had the highest yield (5.980) ton/h. The control treatment had the lowest value (3.987) ton/h.
VL  - 7
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Abd Al Karim Jaafar

Department of Soil Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Damascus University, Damascus, Syria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abd Al Karim Jaafar. (2021). Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity. American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics, 7(4), 81-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abd Al Karim Jaafar. Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity. Am. J. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2021, 7(4), 81-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abd Al Karim Jaafar. Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity. Am J Biol Environ Stat. 2021;7(4):81-87. doi: 10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12,
  author = {Abd Al Karim Jaafar},
  title = {Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity},
  journal = {American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics},
  volume = {7},
  number = {4},
  pages = {81-87},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajbes.20210704.12},
  abstract = {A field experiment was conducted at the farm of Abu Jarash in Agricultural College, using different rates of olive solid waste and cow manure, as follows: (control, Mineral fertilizer +NPK, fresh olive solid waste100%, fresh olive solid waste 75%+ cow manure 25%, fresh olive solid waste 50%+ cow manure 50%, fermented olive solid waste 100%, fermented olive solid waste 75%+ cow manure 25%, fermented olive solid waste 50%+ cow manure 50%, cow manure 100%) the Zink ground fertilizers added for all previous treatments, and cultivation of wheat, the forms of zinc were followed by serial extraction and the study led to the following results: the fermented olive solid waste 100% treatment was Superiority in the amount of zinc forms as following: (total, soluble, exchanged, linked with carbonate, linked with organic matter linked with iron and manganese oxides and residual) the amounts of Zinc were (114.14, 0.19048, 1.0710, 6.329, 9.433, 21.04, 76.10) mg/kg in the same previous order. While the zinc values in the control treatment were (62.90, 0.03847, 0.6081, 3.29, 6.083, 15.03, 37.2) mg/kg for the same forms and in the same previous order. The fermented olive solid waste treatment 100% had the highest yield (5.980) ton/h. The control treatment had the lowest value (3.987) ton/h.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Effect of Fresh and Fermented Olive Solid Waste and Cow Manure on Zinc Forms in Calcareous Soil and Wheat Plant Productivity
AU  - Abd Al Karim Jaafar
Y1  - 2021/11/05
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12
T2  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
JF  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
JO  - American Journal of Biological and Environmental Statistics
SP  - 81
EP  - 87
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2471-979X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajbes.20210704.12
AB  - A field experiment was conducted at the farm of Abu Jarash in Agricultural College, using different rates of olive solid waste and cow manure, as follows: (control, Mineral fertilizer +NPK, fresh olive solid waste100%, fresh olive solid waste 75%+ cow manure 25%, fresh olive solid waste 50%+ cow manure 50%, fermented olive solid waste 100%, fermented olive solid waste 75%+ cow manure 25%, fermented olive solid waste 50%+ cow manure 50%, cow manure 100%) the Zink ground fertilizers added for all previous treatments, and cultivation of wheat, the forms of zinc were followed by serial extraction and the study led to the following results: the fermented olive solid waste 100% treatment was Superiority in the amount of zinc forms as following: (total, soluble, exchanged, linked with carbonate, linked with organic matter linked with iron and manganese oxides and residual) the amounts of Zinc were (114.14, 0.19048, 1.0710, 6.329, 9.433, 21.04, 76.10) mg/kg in the same previous order. While the zinc values in the control treatment were (62.90, 0.03847, 0.6081, 3.29, 6.083, 15.03, 37.2) mg/kg for the same forms and in the same previous order. The fermented olive solid waste treatment 100% had the highest yield (5.980) ton/h. The control treatment had the lowest value (3.987) ton/h.
VL  - 7
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download